|
|
Phone: 1-888-EtherLinx (384-3754)
| |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Market Report Beyond DSL
Cambridge-based Pyramid Research's new
report "Beyond DSL" spells out the case for existing fixed-line
operators to make a serious investment now in 802.11 technologies. With demand growing for high-capacity
Internet among residential users, there will be as many as 60 million
potential wireless LAN users in the United
States by 2007. "These subscribers are going to be served in one way
or another, so at this point the operators need to ask themselves what the
best way is to reach these people," said Daniel Torras, director of
the Americas Group at Pyramid. Torras and lead author Jonathan Tirone set
out to crunch the numbers, and their findings may come as a surprise. One
might assume that the most cost-effective way for a fixed-line operator to
deliver high-speed Internet would be through DSL or cable, since the
hardware infrastructure needed to deliver service in this manner already
exist. In fact, said Torras, "the return on investment for wireless
LAN was much higher." The researchers took into account the costs
of marketing and installation, as well as the modem subsidy, and
determined that it would cost an operator about $1000 to acquire a DSL
subscriber. Comparable measures show that it would cost even more to
secure a cable subscriber (about $1200) whereas a wireless LAN customer
would cost about $800 to acquire. The cost analysis is particularly relevant
in the countryside. "The economics of 802.11 networks are ideal for
rural areas in emerging markets," the authors note. "Systems can
be deployed significantly below the cost of traditional network
architectures, can operate over license-exempt frequencies, and pack the
bandwidth to offer multimedia services. In spite of these arguments, the idea of
residential Wi-Fi is, at this point, barely a blip on the radar of most
service providers. To date, the 802.11 spotlight has shone brightest on the enterprise side, with analysts and media looking most closely at Wi-Fi in offices and on corporate campuses. This in turn may have distracted fixed-line operators from the residential potential for Wi-Fi. While the researchers acknowledge this phenomenon, they warn the Baby Bells and others not to overlook what may be a significant opportunity. "While enterprise adoption may drive the early growth of 802.11 networks, fixed-line operators face a much larger market opportunity in homes and public hot spots," the authors write. "Whereas many enterprises will ultimately own, operate, and manage their wireless LANs, the residential market is primed to generate ongoing cash flows generated through 802.11 services. Maybe so, but other analysts say it is
unlikely that the fixed-line operators will heed the call any time soon. The Pyramid researchers looked not just at
the United States, but also at developing
nations in Latin America, where they found that 802.11 presents an
especially strong mechanism through which fixed-line operators might be
able to gain market share. In the developing world, Wi-Fi offers
"a cost-efficient means to provide connectivity to rural areas that
would never be reached through other solutions," said Torras. While
U.S. consumers might expect to access Wi-Fi at home, Latin American
markets would more likely consume bandwidth through a communal kiosk that
would deliver Internet, e-mail and telephony capabilities. "You could
have a single access point serving a whole village or small city." The state of the Latin American market will
however depend to a large extent on the stability of the Latin American
economy, which at present is in dire straits. The authors acknowledge that
declining foreign investment and deteriorating service capabilities may
keep the telecom sector in check there, at least for the near future. In the United
States, meanwhile, consumers are ever ready to chew up bandwidth, and that
creates a significant Wi-Fi opportunity for fixed line operators, or FLOs. "In the long term, 802.11 networks can
have a positive impact on FLOs' balance sheets," the authors write.
Wireless LANs "have the ability to drive bandwidth consumption to
significantly higher levels. In an industry that has as an underlying
problem the commoditization of bandwidth, wireless LANs will spell relief
to those FLOs first to craft strategies integrating them into their
networks."
|
|
|